So what is the education philosophy of the Howard Government?

You can’t run an education system without a philosophy of education. To be for education, one has to be for some kind of education; be it democratic and integrated curriculum, theocratic indoctrination, skills based industry induction or administratively convenient rote education. We know the Howard Government, by means of the disinformation it has been pushing, is against education philosophies that make use of integrated curriculum.

Wrongly claiming or at least inferring that integrated curriculum does away with disciplines such as history and results in a “post-modern stew”, we can assume that the Howard Government is also anti-homework (hint Julie Bishop; read your Beane.) Heck, Bishop’s Maoist-Elitist bungle shows that at least she is opposed to doing homework, if not opposed to the use of facts.

It is clear from the campaigning that the Howard Government want’s to supplant existing teaching philosophies, BUT WHAT DO THEY INTEND TO REPLACE THEM WITH? It’s not enough to be just “anti-education-philosophy-x”, one needs to also be “pro-education-philosophy-y” otherwise you are just anti-education. What is their philosophy, if they have one and is it supported by their premises?

It’s a serious question that needs to be asked and answered before the next federal election, that is if you value education. This question is going to be a bit of a theme on this blog in the lead-up to the next federal election. Consider it on the agenda!

Advertisements

One thought on “So what is the education philosophy of the Howard Government?

  1. It’s not enough to be just “anti-education-philosophy-x”, one needs to also be “pro-education-philosophy-y” otherwise you are just anti-education.

    And yet another synergy with the Right’s embrace of intelligent design emerges. ID has no positive content, and seems to be comprised wholly of criticisms of evolution. The Howard Government’s philosophy of education seems to be comprised wholly of snipes at existing models–it, too, lacks any positive content or vision. ID is just anti-evolution; Howard’s education policy is merely anti-education.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s